AgentQuota — Team AI usage and cost visibility

See how much each person spends on Cursor, Claude, and APIs — and what it produces

Problem

When teams use multiple AI tools (Cursor, Claude, Copilot, etc.), subscriptions and API fees are scattered and impossible to attribute to specific projects or business outcomes. Managers don't know where money goes or whether it's worth it.

Solution

Connect to mainstream AI tools' APIs or local usage logs, automatically aggregate token consumption and costs per member and per project, and allow tagging tasks or clients to generate cost-vs-output comparison reports. No AI analysis needed — just a clear data dashboard.

Users

Tech leads or engineering managers at small-to-mid-sized dev teams using multiple AI coding tools

MVP

Support importing Cursor and Claude Code usage logs; aggregate costs by member and project; provide simple CSV/dashboard export; no code content storage, only usage metadata

Revenue

Per-seat subscription or tiered pricing by number of integrated tools; open-core with enterprise SSO and audit logs

Why now

Team AI tool spending is growing fast, but dedicated usage and cost attribution for coding agents is missing; API log formats are becoming standardized, letting indie developers integrate quickly