DevToolsAIProductivitySaaS

SpecLint – Spec checker for non-engineer AI builders

Help non-technical indie makers write specs AI can execute without endless rework

Problem
Designers, PMs, and operators are now building full products with AI, but they often describe requirements only by feel, causing AI to repeatedly scrap and rewrite. One maker said their coding level was roughly reading red error text, and they spent two days directing AI to build a mini-app by constantly saying the collision detection was wrong and to try again. Without structured specs, AI just guesses, burning tokens and time.
Solution
A minimalist web tool that guides users through key questions in natural language (who the user is, core flow, edge cases, technical constraints) and auto-generates a structured development spec. Templates are based on common indie projects, and the output can be pasted directly into Cursor, Claude Code, or other coding agents as a consistent reference.
Users
Non-engineering indie makers such as designers, PMs, and operators, plus beginners using AI to write code.
MVP
Pick a scenario template (WeChat mini-program, iOS utility, simple web app); ask 8-12 key questions via a wizard; generate a Markdown spec with entities, flows, and edge cases; export as a system prompt for coding agents; provide a checklist comparing against sample projects.
Revenue
Free for one spec, then pay-per-spec or monthly subscription; also a template marketplace with revenue share.
Why now
Vibe coding lowered the barrier, bringing in many non-technical builders, but AI still needs clear input to produce usable results. Spec checking is an overlooked step.

Source discussions · 3

  1. V2EX[分享创造] 代码只会看红色报错,用 AI 两天做了个「我来挪车啊」0↑ 2
  2. V2EX[问与答] 请问一下,有没有人分享一下,你们是怎么操控 AI 去写项目的呢?特别是大一些的项目。0↑ 5
  3. V2EX[程序员] 33 岁 8 年大厂前端 Gap 三年找工作近况最后一次更新,决定放弃找工作,在家人的支持下决定再创业一年试试,送各位大佬五个码,希望大佬们给个商店好评0↑ 25
← Back to list