AIDevToolsBenchmarkingProductivity

SceneBoard — side-by-side arena for coding agents

Dispatch the same task to multiple coding agents and compare results and cost side by side

Problem
Developers juggle Codex, Claude Code, GLM, Grok, and more, but struggle to know which agent to trust for a given task. Decisions rest on scattered gut feel and ad-hoc comparisons instead of systematic evaluation.
Solution
A local comparison workbench: define a coding task with a repo snapshot or minimal repro, dispatch it to multiple agents in parallel, collect outputs, diffs, latency, and token cost, and generate a side-by-side comparison with scores so developers can pick models and plans based on evidence.
Users
Developers subscribed to multiple AI coding plans, teams evaluating downgrades, and technical writers producing model comparisons.
MVP
Configure multiple agent CLIs or APIs; run the same task in parallel in isolated directories; capture diffs, latency, and token usage; generate a side-by-side report; save and export results locally.
Revenue
Free tier with limits on parallel agents; paid unlock for more seats and report export; affiliate revenue from model subscriptions.
Why now
Multi-model workflows are the norm, but head-to-head comparison is still manual and messy, leaving a clear opening for a lightweight arena.

Source discussions · 4

  1. V2EX[问与答] cursor grok 额度0↑ 8
  2. V2EX[程序员] 基于机密计算的 LLM 推理商
  3. V2EX[程序员] 让多家前沿 agent 互打《星际争霸:母巢之战》0↑ 8
  4. V2EX[程序员] 做了个不同模型醍醐骑车的对比, fable5.1 是真的各项拉满,但是预算有限,在考虑剩下的哪个好0↑ 4
← Back to list