Author/Reviewer Agent Pairing Pipeline

Have two different AI agents review each other's code until it passes or escalates

Problem

When an agent reviews code it just wrote, it almost always approves it, so effectively there is no review. One developer manually pairs Claude Code with Codex as author and reviewer for round-based rechecks, but that workflow is still glue scripts.

Solution

Turn author-reviewer pairing into a configurable local pipeline: pick which agent writes and which reviews, auto-send the diff, get a structured pass/change verdict, verify each point and restate reasons, then stop at a round limit and hand off to a human. Roles are symmetric and every run is logged.

Users

Indie developers and small teams writing code with multiple coding agents who care about quality

MVP

Author/reviewer role config; automatic review loop; structured pass/change verdicts; round cap with human handoff; persisted run logs

Revenue

Open-source lead-gen plus team subscription (shared configs, audit trail), or one-time desktop license

Why now

Multi-model coding just became mainstream while review protocols are still ad-hoc scripts; it can be wrapped on top of existing CLIs by one person