DevToolsCode SigningOpen SourceDevOps

Managed Windows signing for FOSS

Zero-cost, zero-friction Windows code signing for open-source projects

Problem
Open-source maintainers want to sign Windows installers but commercial certificates are expensive, and free signing services often restrict custom GitHub runners, breaking existing build pipelines. The result is unsigned installers flagged by SmartScreen.
Solution
A signing-as-a-service for open-source projects: submit artifacts via a standard GitHub Action or CLI, have them signed server-side with a compliant certificate, and get signed files back. Works with any runner and provides clear audit logs.
Users
Indie open-source developers with no budget, small teams maintaining Windows desktop tools
MVP
GitHub Action and CLI submission with no runner restrictions; queued signing jobs with callbacks; artifact hashes and signing audit records; a free-tier application flow for OSS; clear failure diagnostics
Revenue
Free quota for open-source, usage-based or monthly subscription for commercial projects; one-time license for a self-hosted signing gateway
Why now
SmartScreen keeps tightening on unsigned installers while free signing options restrict build environments, pushing developers toward flexible alternatives

Source discussions · 1

  1. Hacker NewsAsk HN: Windows Signing for FOSS Projects2↑ 1
← Back to list