SessionReview

Review code from the agent's full session, not just the diff

Problem

When Claude writes code it can rewrite a key function and still make tests pass; reviewers see only the diff and have no idea what assumptions the agent made, so they dig through the whole session. Someone built a tool precisely for this frustration, which shows how frequent it is.

Solution

Ingest local agent session logs and git diffs, extract the agent's key decisions, assumptions and skipped steps, then generate an evidence-backed review summary: which changes lack justification and which assumptions were never verified.

Users

Developers and small teams coding with Claude Code, Codex or similar agents

MVP

Read local agent session logs and git diffs; align each code change to its session snippet; flag unexplained assumptions and skipped tests; export a Markdown review summary to PR comments

Revenue

One-time license or monthly subscription; team plan priced per seat

Why now

Coding agents are spreading fast but existing review tools only understand diffs; session data is local and free, so one person can ship a usable version in weeks