AIEvaluationB2BTrust

BenchAudit: independent credibility scoring for agent benchmarks

Third-party audit of AI agent benchmark scores

Problem
Engineers at newer startups report that agent companies buy benchmarks to prove reliability to customers, which looks a lot like pre-2008 credit ratings where the rated party pays the rater. Buyers approving agent products can't tell whether scores are trustworthy or what would actually get a product over the line.
Solution
An independent benchmark audit and reproduction service: rerun public agent benchmarks as a third party, record reproducibility, evidence of test-set tuning, evaluation costs, and failure modes, and publish a credibility score with raw logs. Buyers can request audits of specific products, all results stay public, and the methodology is open source.
Users
Enterprise tech leads procuring or approving AI agents, security and compliance teams, and customers of agent startups
MVP
Independent reruns of 3-5 mainstream agent benchmarks; public logs and configs for every run; reproducibility and bias observations; one-page credibility report
Revenue
Report subscriptions; custom audits per product; open methodology as a trust signal
Why now
Agent procurement is booming while independent evaluation is scarce; the conflict-of-interest problem was just publicly raised, making the timing right

Source discussions · 2

  1. Hacker NewsAsk HN: Are agent benchmarks the new credit ratings?1↑ 0
  2. Reddit[r/SaaS] I’d rather find out my product is bad in 2 weeks than 6 months.
← Back to list