DevToolsEducationAISaaS

MergeKata: fix real AI-written bugs

Practice code review and debugging on bugs actually written by AI assistants

Problem
Code from AI assistants often ships subtle edge-case and logic bugs, and developers have gotten used to pasting and merging fast, letting review skills decay. Existing LeetCode-style problems are hand-designed and deterministic, far from the real defect shapes produced by AI.
Solution
A practice site where each kata is runnable code containing a real bug introduced by AI-generated code; users locate it, edit in-browser, and pass the tests, then get a defect-type breakdown and improvement notes. Filter by language and bug type, and track fix accuracy and time.
Users
Junior-to-mid developers using AI coding assistants and engineers preparing for code review interviews
MVP
20-30 real AI-bug katas; in-browser editor with test runner; defect-type analysis and feedback after submit; filter by language and bug type; personal progress history
Revenue
Free katas plus subscription for advanced sets, team challenges and enterprise training; paid certificates as an add-on
Why now
AI-generated code is the norm but training products for reading and fixing others' code are scarce; the question bank can be expanded with AI help and run by one person

Source discussions · 3

  1. Hacker NewsShow HN: Would You Merge It? – 24 bugs AI assistants write, as fix-it katas2↑ 0
  2. Hacker NewsAsk HN: Non-deterministic leet code small LLM challenge site?1↑ 0
  3. V2EX[程序员] DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 发布了,今晚我让它通宵写代码(Day 4)0↑ 4
← Back to list