LLM API Channel Price Board
Compare official, aggregator, and reseller channels by model—price, hidden costs, and reputation—so developers pick cheap and reliable endpoints.
- Problem
- LLM API channels are exploding: official, aggregators (OpenRouter, Together, Groq, etc.), and resellers. Prices for the same model vary wildly, with hidden costs like cache pricing, free tiers, and minimum top-ups, plus risks of resellers wrapping models or shutting down. Developers must manually compare multiple spreadsheets and community reviews, with information badly fragmented.
- Solution
- A continuously updated price and reputation board that normalizes per-1M-tokens pricing across channels for major models (GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, GLM, Qwen, Kimi, Gemini, Grok, etc.), flags hidden costs like cache rates, free quotas, and minimum deposits, aggregates third-party benchmarks and community sentiment, and marks reseller risk and inclusion criteria.
- Users
- Developers calling multiple LLM APIs, AI app startup teams, indie developers.
- MVP
- Cover 10–15 mainstream models and 15–20 channels; unified price display and sorting; flag hidden costs and risk badges; submission/correction form; weekly auto or semi-auto price refresh.
- Revenue
- Free public board for traffic; Pro tier adds price-change alerts, API availability probes, and channel health scores; affiliate revenue with compliant channels.
- Why now
- Both models and channels are exploding while price transparency is near zero, making selection costly. An indie dev can build a high-value information product from public data with light maintenance, naturally suited to subscriptions.