AgentDocScore: Score Docs for AI Agents
Score and fix your docs site so coding agents can actually read it
- Problem
- Coding agents increasingly read docs before humans do, but most docs sites are hard for them: client-rendered pages, no llms.txt, no markdown versions, soft 404s, pages too big for a context window. A developer on HN built a checker for this, showing it's a real and overlooked pain point.
- Solution
- A CLI tool or SaaS that takes a docs URL, crawls it, scores it against the Agent-Friendly Documentation Spec, and gives concrete fixes: generate llms.txt, output markdown versions, split oversized pages, fix soft 404s. Integrate into CI to auto-check on deploy and open fix PRs.
- Users
- Developer relations teams, technical writers, open-source maintainers, and docs leads at SaaS companies
- MVP
- Only scan a URL and score it against the open spec; output an actionable fix list; generate basic llms.txt and markdown conversion; provide an online score page as lead magnet; support a GitHub Action.
- Revenue
- Free basic scans; paid subscription for advanced features (continuous monitoring, auto-fix PRs, private repo integration) at $19-49/mo per docs site.
- Why now
- AI coding agents are rapidly being adopted, but docs sites haven't been optimized for them yet—a brief window. An indie hacker can implement the spec quickly and establish a standard.
Source discussions · 1
- Hacker NewsShow HN: Check how readable your docs are to AI agents1↑ 0